boringmuse: (Default)
Gosh, I don’t even know where to start.

This novel had been lingering in my TBR for months before I finally picked it up. Despite its bestseller status, what provoked my desire to read it was actually that incomprehensible mess of a website called Tumblr (sorry not sorry, David); bloggers that I follow are still avidly making gifsets and fan art of the book, even though it was published over two decades ago.

The Secret History is an incredibly compelling tale told from the perspective of Richard Papen, a poor, Californian student attending an elite college in Vermont named Hampden. The plotline runs the course of a year, detailing Richard’s gradual entry into and newfound fascination with the world of the school’s idiosyncratic Classics students Henry, Bunny, Charles, Camilla, and Francis as well as their enigmatic instructor, Julian Morrow. Richard finds himself enraptured by them and their unconventional modes of thought, and as they cast their influences upon him, his own morals and thoughts on concepts such as beauty and existence are metamorphosed.

“Does such a thing as ‘the fatal flaw,’ that showy dark crack running down the middle of a life, exist outside literature? I used to think it didn’t. Now I think it does. And I think that mine is this: a morbid longing for the picturesque at all costs.”

Told in the format of an inverted detective story, readers know right off the bat what the big crime— in this case, a murder— entails, and slowly learn how it was committed and why it was committed. Tartt masterfully weaves suspense throughout the story, building a subtle, yet palpable tension. The book’s considerable length does not impair any sense of excitement or anxiety from budding, as her writing style (sometimes winding, other times abrupt) ensures every line is carefully crafted to inspire tangible images of the events in the reader’s mind. The dialogue is usually strong, dynamic, and interesting (though at points, unrealistic); the characters speak in puzzling riddles and hushed Greek, and constantly make reference to classic, high-brow texts or obscure mythos. Their verbal interactions are never boring, but mystifying.

The main characters are brilliantly illustrated, collectively defined by their refined manners and formal way of dress, and individually defined by their speech habits and quirks (as noted by the narrator). As to Richard; he clearly is conflicted, interests swaying between a partiality for alone time (evidenced by the comfort he finds in Dr. Roland’s office on some nights) and the intrigue of the Classics students. His reactions to dark secrets lurking in the plot mainly consist of quiet fascination rather than outrage or horror; he goes along with the flow of events despite moral questions that bubble up from time to time. These aspects make him a very interesting lens to read through, and, because he isn’t originally aware of what’s going on behind the scenes like the others do, the suspense is upped.

Some critiques to make— firstly, The Secret History does start out a bit slow, and I found myself losing focus until things started getting a bit more intense. I felt like too many pages were devoted to trivial matters (smoking cigarettes to no end, drinking, irrelevant parties) or conversations or plot points that never make a recurrence/are never fully explained, particularly in regards to Harry’s relationships with certain characters (Camilla, Julian). Therefore, I think a lot of this unnecessary text could have been truncated to create a briefer yet more suspenseful product.

Secondly— and this is perhaps what bugged me the most— Tartt’s detailed writing style, while very careful and expressive, too many times rubbed off on me as self-conscious and florid. I’m not necessarily referring to the plethora of casual allusions to Greek history and mythology, but in general to the excessive amount of “artsy” metaphors and “witty” descriptions shoved into what seems like every single paragraph. While I wouldn’t necessarily call her style pretentious, I did get the sense that she was overly concerned with trying to make the prose sound elevated and intellectual. Thankfully, this issue is countered by the utterly transfixing tale Tartt weaves, so for the most part I could overlook it.

All in all The Secret History was an engrossing, anxiety-inducing read, despite certain flaws I found with it; there are very stunning meanings concealed in its depths. It’s the first book I’ve read in a while that I simply couldn’t bear to put down.


boringmuse: (Default)

Before I get into the meat of this post, I would like to wish anyone who’s reading a (late) Merry Christmas and happy holidays! Hopefully you all had fun and spent some time with your friends and family unlike I, who was laying in bed working on a fanfiction while my parents were in Vegas partying it up.


I’m going to be doing a brief film review of Hallmark’s Christmas at Pemberley Manor because, if you haven’t noticed yet, I’m obsessed with Pride and Prejudice and love watching any adaptations of the novel. As a disclaimer, this is my first time watching a Hallmark Christmas movie, so the popular critiques I’ve heard about the “genre” (for instance that they’re all formulaic, slightly altered versions of each other), will be disregarded in my review.


  • ︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵

Christmas at Pemberley Manor essentially revolves around Elizabeth Bennet (played by Jessica Lowndes), an event planner from New York, planning for Lambton Town’s Annual Christmas Festival, where her friend from college George is the mayor. Caroline, Elizabeth’s snarky boss, is reluctant to let her take charge of the event, seeing as it’s going to be held under the company’s prestigious title, but she manages to stay upbeat.


When Elizabeth arrives at Lambton, she has an unpleasant first meeting with billionaire Mr. Darcy– played by the very charming and attractive Michael Rady– whose beautiful estate she eventually convinces him to provide as a venue for the festival when things don’t work out with the original location. As they start working together to make the event a success, they begin falling for each other.


  • ︵‿︵‿୨♡୧‿︵‿︵

As many holiday-themed films go, this one is lighthearted and feel-good; definitely something to nestle up with on a cold day. Elizabeth and Darcy’s relationship was alright, and I thought the modern vocations they were given suited them well. The cast members for the most part do a fine job with their roles, especially Elaine Hendrix, who plays an aggravating modern Caroline Bingley. I will say, however, that I despised the casting for Elizabeth; Lowndes has this annoying valley girl accent that I can never take seriously on a person, especially in this case where it’s Elizabeth Bennet being portrayed. She sounds utterly disingenuous and I cannot stand her inflections, much less her singing. At least she tries! (Shrug)


I was let down by this movie. The winter holidays are my favorite time of year, and hearing that a Pride and Prejudice inspired film based around the holiday season would be released got me thrilled. But despite all its festive feel, this adaptation turned out to be very loosely connected to the original novel. I mean extremely loosely. Many characters are completely extirpated, and I was confused by some of the nods made; was George supposed to be George Wickham? If so, why are there no hard feelings between his character and Darcy’s? And then there’s Jane Lucas, whose name I’m assuming is a mash-up of Jane Bennet and Charlotte Lucas (???). Even Bingley isn’t in the movie! Instead, Darcy has a skittish assistant named Travis. Why couldn’t they have just named him Charles? It would have been so easy to bring Pride’s original cast to life here, but I guess I was doomed to be disappointed.


Apart from my issues with how the film incorporated the original plot, I wanted to bring up that I didn’t feel much chemistry between the two leads. Lowndes and Rady did have some sweet moments, but for the most part it felt awkward and disjointed. The entirety of the movie was predictable, and the dialogue was so contrived. And what was up with the festival itself? The characters were all gushing about how the crowd was bigger than ever before, but I swear under thirty people actually showed up to the “great event.” I cringed, big time.


The few aspects I did like were Jane and Travis’s relationship and, of course, Michael Rady. He’s so sweet and charming and handsome and UGH he deserves a better Elizabeth! There was so much more that could have been done with this idea, but in the end it’s just an insult to Austen’s novel and, as an avid fangirl, I did not get what I was expecting, or hoping for.


If you’re not as big a fan of Pride and Prejudice as I am, you might like Christmas at Pemberley Manor more than I did, but for me it absolutely failed my expectations.




boringmuse: (Default)
I've been working (somewhat sporadically) on a modern Pride and Prejudice AU, and yes, as you can tell from the title, it's a coffee shop AU. I've never actually put so much effort into a fan fiction before so this is a bit of a first to me.

The gist of the story is that Mr. Darcy owns a new coffee shop in town, which houses several interactions between the characters; meanwhile, the Bennets own a used bookstore. I've tried to retain the canonical personalities of the original novel but also want to add my own insight into aspects like the Bennet sisters' relationships; I want to develop the less popular sisters and also establish closer bonds between them for a warm feel. Dialogue is one of the core features of my fic, just like the original novel. 

If this premise sounds interesting to you, please do check out Coffee at Pemberley's on my AO3 account. Thirty chapters are currently forecasted, though there may be less or there may be more. I'd also love to get some feedback from other writers or fans of Austen!

Your resident Pride and Prejudice fangirl,
Isabella

boringmuse: (Default)
Hello everyone! I only recently discovered this website and it looks like it has a great community, which is why I joined! As an introduction, I'm Isabella, XVII, and find interest in art, books, music, attractive men, films, and period dramas. I do own a Tumblr (angelvault.tumblr.com) which has about 2K followers at the moment, but I feel like this website is more authentic as people actually write their own posts whereas a majority of Tumblr is people reblogging others' posts (which is great and all, but still strange to me).

I'll probably use this site to rant about life and also gush about my favorite fictional pairings and shows and all that. Pride and Prejudice is probably my favorite thing to exist; Jane Austen is brilliant. I've read P&P and Emma by her and can't wait to indulge in the rest of her novels. The fandoms I find myself a part of are quite widespread; I recently watched Stoker (2013) which has got me hooked. Actually, a lot of the films Mia Wasikowska has starred in tend to be favorites, Crimson Peak (2015) is another (also Tom Hiddleston!). Other random movies I greatly enjoyed are Amélie (2001), Heathers (1988), Dead Poets Society (1989), and Les Yeux sans Visage (1960), an unsettling and poetic French horror film.

Aside from Pride and Prejudice, my favorite books include The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, Jane Eyre, The Picture of Dorian Gray, The Awakening (by Kate Chopin), and In Cold Blood. There's obviously more to list but this post would be getting too lengthy by that point.

DW looks promising; I hope I get to make some friends! I haven't met anyone IRL who shares my interests, so online is really the only place I can seek refuge in for these kinds of things. Happy holidays to all!

Profile

boringmuse: (Default)
boringmuse

January 2019

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
131415161718 19
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 04:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios